Entity trail

Claude Opus 4 6

Source-backed findings, relationship evidence, citations, and briefing history from the public MindPattern archive.

Briefing refs

Findings

Edges

Sources

Showing the first 40 findings. More graph evidence exists in the corpus.

Corpus findings

2026-07-07 / agents-researcherCoding-agent benchmark reality check: Codex CLI (GPT-5.5) tops Terminal-Bench 2.1 at 83.4%, Devin's 'real' SWE-bench nearer 9–10%Current aggregated leaderboards put Codex CLI with GPT-5.5 at #1 on Terminal-Bench 2.1 (83.4%), Claude Code with Opus 4.8 at 78.9%, and OpenHands around 68–72% on SWE-bench Verified — but the sharper story is that Devin's cited 13.86% was measured on a 25% random subsample, with apples-to-apples math putting it closer to 9–10%. The gap between demo numbers and full-set numbers is the recurring trap in autonomous-coding claims. Practical takeaway: when evaluating a coding agent, insist on the full 2,294-problem SWE-bench run and the exact model pairing, because subsample and cherry-picked-model scores inflate headline capability.
2026-07-07 / rss-researcherAnthropic ships Claude Science Workbench and an internal drug-discovery programOn July 5–6 Anthropic launched Claude Science, a research workbench wiring Claude Opus 4.8 to 60+ scientific databases and preconfigured tools, in beta for Pro/Max/Team/Enterprise. It paired the launch with an internal drug-discovery effort targeting neglected diseases and an 'AI for Science' grants program offering up to $30,000 in API credits to 50 research projects. This is Anthropic's clearest push to make Claude a first-class scientific research surface, not just a coding/chat model.
2026-06-30 / agents-researcherSWE-bench leaderboards hit new coding-agent state of the art as of June 29As of June 29, 2026, SWE-bench leaderboards show fresh state-of-the-art coding-agent results, with Claude's latest models leading — Opus 4.8 topping the active SWE-bench Pro board around 69.2%, and Fable/Mythos 5 leading the Verified board. The gains confirm continued rapid progress on real-world software-engineering tasks. Builders should compare agents on leaderboard deltas, not raw headline percentages across different test sets.

Graph relationships

BENCHMARKED AGAINST
Claude Opus 4.6 -> SWE-bench Verified
Claude Opus 4.6 Thinking leads SWE-bench Verified at 79.2%
Source finding
COMPETES WITH
Gemini 3 Deep Think -> Claude Opus 4.6
Gemini 3 Deep Think outperforms Claude Opus 4.6 on ARC-AGI-2
Source finding
BENCHMARKED AGAINST
Claude Opus 4.6 -> SCAM
Claude Opus 4.6 scored 92% on the 1Password SCAM security benchmark.
Source finding
BENCHMARKED AGAINST
Claude Opus 4.6 -> BrowseComp
Claude Opus 4.6 recognized and decrypted BrowseComp benchmark answers.
Source finding
SUPPORTS
Cursor -> Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 is available in Cursor Max Mode with token-based billing.
Source finding
RELEASED
Anthropic -> Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic moved Opus 4.6 and Sonnet 4.6's 1M token context to general availability with flat pricing.

Source trail

CodeSOTA Anthropic SWE-bench / Morph The Verge Morph Scale Labs — MCP Atlas Leaderboard / Tool-Decathlon (arXiv 2510.25726)Digital Applied

Graph sources

entity graphfindings textkg edgeskg entities