Entity trail

SimpleBench

Source-backed findings, relationship evidence, citations, and briefing history from the public MindPattern archive.

Briefing refs

Findings

Edges

Sources

Corpus findings

2026-09-06 / reddit-researcherCommunity claim that frontier models are crossing SimpleBench's 83.7% human baseline is not yet confirmed by the benchmark siteA 191-upvote r/singularity post charts frontier models beginning to cross SimpleBench's human baseline, with the poster noting the baseline comes from 9 non-specialist native English speakers each answering 25 of 213 questions, and scores are averaged over 5 runs against a 16.7% random floor. The poster also states Astra has not been measured because the benchmark is private and Phillip only runs models with a no-retention API. Both simple-bench.com and Epoch AI's SimpleBench page still return no model above 83.7%, with Claude Fable at 81.9%, so this remains a community chart against a lagging official leaderboard, exactly the pattern that made a similar claim unverifiable on 2026-09-04.
2026-08-14 / reddit-researcherGrok 4.6 Ties GPT-5.6 Sol Max at 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index — One Point Behind Fable 5 Max, at a Fraction of the CostSpaceXAI's Grok 4.6, released August 12, scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, exactly tying GPT-5.6 Sol Max and landing one point under Fable 5 Max's 62, while overtaking Kimi K3. It leads GDPval-AA v2 at 1753 (vs Fable 5 Max 1741, Sol Max 1728) and AA-Briefcase at 1577 (vs 1574 and 1502), and beats Sol on 6 of 9 shared benchmarks — but collapses on agentic coding, posting 26% on Terminal-Bench v3.0 against 34.6% for Sol and 34.1% for Fable 5. The r/singularity thread framing it as beating Sol on SimpleBench (113up/37c) overstates a genuinely split result: Grok wins on professional-work evals and price, loses on long-horizon coding agents.
2026-04-23 / reddit-researcherOpus 4.7 Scores Lower Than Both 4.6 and 4.5 on SimpleBench — 332 Upvotes on r/singularityA SimpleBench benchmark comparison posted to r/singularity (332 upvotes, 65 comments) shows Claude Opus 4.7 scoring lower than both Opus 4.6 and Opus 4.5 on the common-sense reasoning benchmark curated by AI Explained. This adds quantitative evidence to the growing community perception that Opus 4.7 traded reasoning breadth for coding specialization — SWE-bench improved 7 points but other capabilities regressed.
2026-03-07 / reddit-researcherGPT-5.4 Community Reception: Knowledge-Hallucination Paradox + API Pricing RevoltGPT-5.4 community reception is split. On knowledge benchmarks (SimpleBench), it scores significantly better than GPT-5.2 Pro. But practitioners report it's "one of the least trustworthy — knows a lot but makes stuff up when it doesn't." API pricing for 5.4 Pro draws sharp criticism: "an order of magnitude more than Sonnet — who the hell is going to pay?" (240up, 64 comments). The hallucination-versus-knowledge tradeoff and pricing backlash are the dominant practitioner signals.

Graph relationships

BENCHMARKED AGAINST
Claude Fable
Claude Fable scores 81.9% on SimpleBench
Source finding
BENCHMARKED AGAINST
GPT-5.4
GPT-5.4 scores significantly better than GPT-5.2 Pro on SimpleBench.
Source finding
BENCHMARKED AGAINST
Astra
Astra awaits SimpleBench measurement due to private benchmark and no-retention API
Source finding
BENCHMARKED AGAINST
Claude Fable -> SimpleBench
Claude Fable scores 81.9% on SimpleBench
Source finding
BENCHMARKED AGAINST
GPT-5.4 -> SimpleBench
GPT-5.4 scores significantly better than GPT-5.2 Pro on SimpleBench.
Source finding

Source trail

Claude Code v2.1.117 r/ClaudeAI post 332 upvotes on r/singularity The model r/singularity (191 upvotes)Artificial Analysis (corroborated by VentureBeat and officechai); r/singularity 113up/37c r/singularity

Graph sources

entity graphfindings textkg edgeskg entitiesnewsletter issues

Fetching from the wire…