← The Wire

Public story · 2026-07-02 · high

Meituan open-sources 1.6T coding model built on Chinese chips

LongCat-2.0 already ranks top three on OpenRouter by call volume, using zero Nvidia or AMD chips.

Why now: As of July 2, 2026, VentureBeat's coverage of the MIT license and benchmark scores is the clearest builder-facing look at LongCat-2.0 available.

Confidence
high
Sources
1
Redaction
passed

Story

Meituan released LongCat-2.0 under an MIT license, a 1.6-trillion-parameter Mixture-of-Experts model built for agentic coding. It scores 59.5 on SWE-bench Pro and 70.8 on Terminal-Bench, and a preview version already ranked top three by call volume on OpenRouter, per VentureBeat.

The number that matters isn't the benchmark score. It's the training cluster: roughly 50,000 domestic chips, zero Nvidia A100s or H100s, zero AMD MI300X. Meituan built a frontier-adjacent coding model without any of the hardware that export controls were designed to block.

Efficient by necessity

LongCat-2.0 uses what VentureBeat describes as a Zero-Compute Experts router, activating only about 33 to 56 billion parameters per token out of the full 1.6 trillion. That's a MoE design choice, but it's also what you'd build if your chip supply was constrained and every FLOP had to count. The model also supports a 1M-token context window, the kind of spec that makes it usable for whole-repo agentic work instead of isolated code completion.

For builders comparing open coding models, this changes the calculus. A model that's MIT-licensed and trained outside the Nvidia and AMD supply chain removes a dependency a lot of teams didn't know they had. It's one more open option backed by real benchmark numbers, not just weights and a README.

A related report covered frontier access getting gated to government-approved partners elsewhere. Meituan went the opposite direction, publishing weights anyone can run without a gate.

What's not in VentureBeat's reporting: pricing for hosted inference, or how the 1M-token context holds up on real repositories rather than benchmarks. The architecture answers the compute question. It doesn't answer the reliability one.

Related stories

Each link below shares sources, entities, or timing with this story.

  1. Same source domain

    Microsoft Takes Agent 365 Live to Govern Shadow AI

    Reported by the same outlet (venturebeat.com).

  2. Frontier capability and general availability are now decoupled by policy.

    Reported by the same outlet (venturebeat.com).

  3. Three AI coding agents leaked secrets through one prompt injection payload.

    Reported by the same outlet (venturebeat.com).

  4. Microsoft patched a Copilot Studio injection and data still leaked.

    Reported by the same outlet (venturebeat.com).

  5. Claude Code Artifacts turn an agent session into a live, shareable app.

    Reported by the same outlet (venturebeat.com).

  6. Anthropic's Claude Design overhaul enforces design-system fidelity, finally.

    Reported by the same outlet (venturebeat.com).

  7. Your model is an upstream dependency you don't control. Plan accordingly.

    Reported by the same outlet (venturebeat.com).

  8. Kimi K2.7-Code: a 1T-param open coding model with benchmarks nobody can check

    Reported by the same outlet (venturebeat.com).

Source trail

Claim evidence

  1. Meituan MIT-licensed LongCat-2.0, a 1.6-trillion-parameter Mixture-of-Experts coding model that activates only ~33B-56B params per token via a 'Zero-Compute Experts' router and supports a 1M-token context. It scores 59.5 on SWE-bench Pro and 70.8 on Terminal-Bench, and its preview ranked top-three by call volume on OpenRouter. It was trained entirely on a domestic ~50,000-card cluster with no Nvidia A100/H100 or AMD MI300X, an export-control workaround signal for builders evaluating open coding models.

Provenance

Canonical issue
2026-07-02
AI generated
yes
Story unit
15436
Labels
source-backed